| 1 |
On 11/14/2011 3:03 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 14 November 2011 14:00:01 Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 11/13/2011 11:37 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On Sunday 13 November 2011 16:42:39 Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> If I understand you correctly, you are just going to add a "cxx" use |
| 6 |
>>>> flag to gcc for some transitional period? If so, I can simply switch it |
| 7 |
>>>> at some point after you add the new flag? |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> transition period: |
| 10 |
>>> http://sources.gentoo.org/www-client/google-chrome/google-chrome-17.0.932 |
| 11 |
>>> .0_alpha108826.ebuild?r1=1.1&r2=1.2 |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>>> eventually you can drop the [-nocxx] dep, but it'll prob be a while. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> Why do I need the [-nocxx] dep at this point? Everybody is going to end |
| 16 |
>> up rebuilding gcc with the new use flag anyway. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> some people might, but not everyone. if we remove the [-nocxx], and someone |
| 19 |
> where to run `emerge google-chrome -u`, portage would fail with dependency |
| 20 |
> errors. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Actually, it pulls in gcc[cxx], and rebuilds gcc. There is no dependency |
| 23 |
error. We can prevent an unnecessary gcc rebuild by listing [-nocxx] |
| 24 |
first however, so I committed that. |
Archives