From: | Torsten Veller <ml-en@××××××.net> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass | ||
Date: | Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:09:13 | ||
Message-Id: | 20100417220459.TAa44e0.tv@veller.net | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass by James Cloos |
1 | * James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com>: |
2 | > >>>>> "TV" == Torsten Veller <ml-en@××××××.net> writes: |
3 | > TV> There was a reason why the man-pages were removed: I think it was |
4 | > TV> collisions protection and perl people use `perldoc` anyway. |
5 | > |
6 | > Perl people -- I'm one -- use man(1); given the differences in |
7 | > usefulness, I cannot imagine why anyone would prefer perldoc(1) |
8 | > over man(1). |
9 | |
10 | Please file a bug if you want man pages for all the modules. |
11 | |
12 | Thanks |