Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/foremost: ChangeLog foremost-1.5.6.ebuild
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:07:03
Message-Id: 200911081606.58723.patrick@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/foremost: ChangeLog foremost-1.5.6.ebuild by "Petteri Räty"
1 On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:56:24 Petteri Räty wrote:
2 > Patrick Lauer wrote:
3 > > On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:21:18 Peter Volkov wrote:
4 > >> В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 11:56 +0000, Patrick Lauer (patrick) пишет:
5 > >>> patrick 09/11/08 11:56:46
6 > >>> Log:
7 > >>> Bump
8 > >>>
9 > >>> file :
10 > >>> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-forensics/foremost/
11 > >>>fo remost-1.5.6.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
12 > >>>
13 > >>> Index: foremost-1.5.6.ebuild
14 > >>> ===================================================================
15 > >>>
16 > >>> inherit eutils toolchain-funcs
17 > >>>
18 > >>> DESCRIPTION="A console program to recover files based on their headers
19 > >>> and footers" HOMEPAGE="http://foremost.sourceforge.net/"
20 > >>> #SRC_URI="mirror://sourceforge/${PN}/${P}.tar.gz"
21 > >>> # starting to hate sf.net ...
22 > >>> SRC_URI="http://foremost.sourceforge.net/pkg/foremost-1.5.6.tar.gz"
23 > >>
24 > >> Patrick, do you remember the answer on question number 1 in end-quiz?
25 > >
26 > > Yeah, and if sf.net would even tangentially try to work I might care.
27 > > Took me long enough to get a file out of it, and if I feel like it I
28 > > might even fix that SRC_URI to make people happy.
29 > > Ah well. Since they love changing paths around it won't work for the next
30 > > bump anyway ...
31 >
32 > The filename that violates our policies hasn't changed between the new
33 > and old SRC_URI.
34 >
35 Correct. Just the PATH. Which is not the filename.
36
37 And because I'm a lazy bum I copypasta'ed it out of the mess the sourceforge
38 people call a website. And then I even managed to fetch that file after 3 or 4
39 tries, so I was happy to have gotten it and cared more to see if it works.
40
41 So I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details and just fix
42 it instead of whining at me until my motivation takes a long walk on the beach
43 and doesn't return for quite some time. At least I'm trying to keep these
44 packages alive, which noone else seems to do.

Replies