1 |
On 03/28/2010 09:27 AM, Brian Harring wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 01:03:43AM -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote: |
3 |
>> I seriously hate changing USE flags for the sake of changing use |
4 |
>> flags. This provides a moderate amount of annoyance for anyone that |
5 |
>> maintains more then one Gentoo box because they need to then tinker |
6 |
>> with their /etc/make.conf and /etc/portage/package.use to get |
7 |
>> everything right again. And oh no what if the one box is on ~arch and |
8 |
>> one isn't and what if one is x86 and one isn't. Its just such a |
9 |
>> configuration nightmare. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> So unless there's any real benefit, I'm against this. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I'm not arguing for arbitrary changes, but if the change makes sense |
14 |
> and isn't trivial it should be done. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> What is needed is to tweak the tools for such a move- specifically |
17 |
> adding a new command to the update machinery (profiles/updates). |
18 |
> Something roughly like |
19 |
> |
20 |
> usemove [atom] original_flag new_flag |
21 |
> |
22 |
> If an atom is specified, the move applies only to w/in that pkg; if no |
23 |
> atom, it's a global shift in the configuration (meaning all ebuilds |
24 |
> now use gtk instead of gtk2 for example). |
25 |
> |
26 |
|
27 |
Filed Future EAPI request: |
28 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311731 |
29 |
|
30 |
> |
31 |
> USE_EXPAND, roughly- I wouldn't say it's fully there, but it certainly |
32 |
> would be where I'd start for any proposal... |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
A good point. So how about renaming gnutls openssl and nss to |
36 |
ssl_implementation_* to make the usage clear? |
37 |
|
38 |
Regards, |
39 |
Petteri |