Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Aurélien Gouny" <aurelien@×××××.org>
To: veldy@×××××.net
Cc: kdolkas@××××××××××××.gr, gentoo-dev@g.o, manson@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ?
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:09:25
Message-Id: 13140.195.68.7.131.1040133205.squirrel@webmail.gouny.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? by "Thomas T. Veldhouse"
1 Thomas T. Veldhouse said:
2 > Rodney,
3 >
4 > Please remask this (portage-2.0.45-r6) ASAP.
5 >
6 > Tom Veldhouse
7 >
8
9 I'm not Rodney but I've made a 'emerge rsync' and there is no portage to
10 be updated, it seems to have been masked.
11
12 Thanks guys for warning,
13 --
14 Aurélien Gouny
15 ______________________________
16 Email: aurelien@×××××.org
17 Web: http://aurelien.gouny.org
18
19
20
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@×××××.net>
Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@×××××.net>
Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? Georgios Kylafas <gkyla@×××××××××.gr>