| 1 |
On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 11:22 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10/09/2011 11:15 πμ, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > I would say that each package needs to have at least one herd or |
| 5 |
> > maintainer (which may be maintainer-needed or maintainer-wanted). |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> Well, you can easily assign your packages to dozen of herds and still |
| 8 |
> be the only one who touches them. So what's the point? Just to pretend |
| 9 |
> that the package is supported by an entire herd? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I don't think that's what Mike was trying to say. He prolly wanted to |
| 13 |
say that it's required to have at least one of <maintainer> or <herd>, |
| 14 |
i.e. having one tag for m-n or the real maintainer is enough (no extra |
| 15 |
no-herd entry). Sounds pretty reasonable to me. |
Archives