Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@...>
Subject: Re: udev and /usr
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:06:35 +0000 (UTC)
Joost Roeleveld posted on Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:36:27 +0200 as excerpted:

> I agree, I just used this example to explain that it shouldn't be
> necessary to force an initramfs on all users just because there is a
> small group who wants to have an extreme setup.

Careful with the "extreme".  As you no doubt realize by now, the udev 
folks apparently consider anyone wanting a separate /usr but not an initr* 
"extreme".  That'd certainly apply double if said admin (since no simple 
"user" cares about such stuff, in this view) had /usr on lvm.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman



Replies:
Re: Re: udev and /usr
-- Joshua Kinard
Re: Re: udev and /usr
-- Joost Roeleveld
References:
udev and /usr
-- Joost Roeleveld
Re: udev and /usr
-- Joost Roeleveld
Re: udev and /usr
-- Robin H. Johnson
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: udev and /usr
Next by thread:
Re: Re: udev and /usr
Previous by date:
Re: [RFC] Adding a tiny install-mask directory list to gx86
Next by date:
Re: x32 fun pants


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.