Archives
Archives
| From: | Stefan Schweizer <genstef@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: packages going into the tree with non-gentoo maintainers | ||
| Date: | Sun, 03 Sep 2006 16:50:53 | ||
| Message-Id: | edeogp$qui$1@sea.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: packages going into the tree with non-gentoo maintainers by Paul de Vrieze |
||
| 1 | Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 2 | > For this stuff, add a comment to the metadata.xml file. Don't do it in |
| 3 | > this less than obvious way. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | arch teams for example will still contact me then for stabilizing, I do not |
| 6 | want that. jeeves and herdstat do not support comments and the metadata is |
| 7 | not often read directly. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | > The maintainer must still be someone with a |
| 10 | > gentoo email. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | is that written down somewhere? I was under the impression that it is |
| 13 | allowed and have seen it used for example |
| 14 | in /usr/portage/www-client/links/metadata.xml |
| 15 | |
| 16 | - Stefan |
| 17 | |
| 18 | -- |
| 19 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: packages going into the tree with non-gentoo maintainers | "Kevin F. Quinn" <kevquinn@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: packages going into the tree with non-gentoo maintainers | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |