Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On 27.06.2011 15:28, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>
> So I know a bunch of people have already looked at it, and I'd like to
> know: what do you find better about the Ruby approach compared to the
> Python approach? Is it just the size of python.eclass, or are there a
> number of other issues?
>
I like the ruby approach for the reason that it doesn't require users to
run update scripts like python-updater.
Regards,
Petteri
|
|
