Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 03:54, Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote:
> That would be an ok approach from my perspective: We could just change
> line 14 of python.eclass and let package maintainers report breakage as
> they increment EAPI. I am confident that nothing EAPI <= 3 would break.
>
> Is anyone (especially djc and the python herd members) opposed to this?
Seems fine to me; I can't really think of a practical better way.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
|
| Replies: |
Re: python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really annoying
-- Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
|
| References: |
python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really annoying
-- Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
|
Re: python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really annoying
-- Matt Turner
|
Re: python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really annoying
-- Brian Harring
|
Re: python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really annoying
-- Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
|
Re: python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really annoying
-- Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
|
Re: python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really annoying
-- Alec Warner
|
Re: python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really annoying
-- Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
|
Re: python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really annoying
-- Mike Gilbert
|
| Navigation: |
|
Lists:
gentoo-dev:
< Prev
By Thread
Next >
< Prev
By Date
Next >
|
| Previous by thread: |
| Re: python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really annoying |
| Next by thread: |
| Re: python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really annoying |
| Previous by date: |
| Re: Suggestion for getting rid of udev |
| Next by date: |
| Re: python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really annoying |
|
