On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:15:25 -0600
Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:54:38 +0000
> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@...> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:51:11 +0100
> > Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote:
> > > > 2. (with myeclass.eclass containing EAPI=2)
> > > > -----
> > > > EAPI=1
> > > > inherit myeclass
> > > 
> > > Invalid
> > 
> > QA violation, but legal and a pain in the ass.
> 
> I didn't think it was a brainy thing to do, but I can't find anything
> saying it isn't allowed.  It probably shouldn't be.

Ah now i did.  

-- 
gcc-porting,                                      by design, by neglect
treecleaner,                              for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo     EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662