| 1 |
2011/4/29 Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>: |
| 2 |
> 2011/3/9 Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o>: |
| 3 |
>> As for the reasons: "its the fdo version + a debian/patches dir with, heh, |
| 4 |
>> some fixes and improvements I'm using..." |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> So, the SDS version is simply the freedesktop version with a few |
| 7 |
> patches on top? So, the freedesktop version is actually... upstream? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> We patch plenty of things in Gentoo. Why are we depending on SDS to do |
| 10 |
> that for us? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Matt |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
So...? Why are we shipping this version when it seems to be just the |
| 15 |
upstream version + patches? People on the X11 team already have commit |
| 16 |
access to freedesktop, and by extension, libva, so if the patches are |
| 17 |
reasonable we could just commit them ourselves. Why are we bothering |
| 18 |
with this SDS version? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
You weren't kidding about not being on IRC. !seen aballier says 7 months ago. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Matt |
Archives