Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012]
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 20:23:30
Message-Id: 20120510222321.1dbd144b@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Thu, 10 May 2012 21:14:33 +0100
2 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > On Thu, 10 May 2012 22:13:33 +0200
5 > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
6 > > > On Thu, 10 May 2012 20:55:02 +0100
7 > > > Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote:
8 > > > > Make a constructive criticism if you really need to rant about
9 > > > > software that nobody forces you to use.
10 > > >
11 > > > Not that I agree with anything Fabio has ever said, but I believe
12 > > > the issue under discussion here is that tight coupling and
13 > > > vertical integration means we are in effect forced to use rather
14 > > > a lot of software that we would prefer not to.
15 > >
16 > > No, I don't think you are forced to use anything. As was proven
17 > > before, there are always alternatives.
18 >
19 > That's a somewhat disingenuous claim when the alternatives are moving
20 > steadily towards "don't use Linux at all" or "use the full GnomeOS
21 > stack".
22
23 Then go rant upstream about it. Or another upstream. Or do something
24 useful yourself.
25
26 --
27 Best regards,
28 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature