Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: foser <foser@g.o>
Subject: Re: RFC: eutils addition - preserve_old_lib
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 18:32:21 +0200
On Sat, 2004-10-02 at 15:26 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> When the soname of a lib changes between versions of a package, we need
> to do a revdep-rebuild --soname <old lib> to make sure all programs that
> link against the old lib are rebuilt to use the new one.  In order to
> not break currently installed programs, it is best for a package to keep
> the old version around until this process is done and the user deletes
> the file.  Currently it is up to the individual package maintainers to
> do this in their own way.  I've had to do it enough times that I decided
> it might be best to just write something into eutils.eclass to handle
> it... so...

In my experience most packages that change their .so versioning do so
unneeded, best is to just fix the upstream versioning & ask the
maintainers to do it 'correctly'. Only in a few select cases it is
really needed to do revdep-rebuild.

- foser
Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)
References:
RFC: eutils addition - preserve_old_lib
-- Jeremy Huddleston
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: RFC: eutils addition - preserve_old_lib
Next by thread:
Reverse dep checking (not qpkg -q)
Previous by date:
small eutils.eclass addition / kernel.eclass subtraction
Next by date:
Re: mail-filter/amavis deprecated


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.