1 |
On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 04:45:23PM -0800, Sébastien Fabbro wrote: |
2 |
> > > Anyone with better understanding of the licences could help? |
3 |
> > > Upstream does not answer. |
4 |
> > Can you list the license files please? I'll poke at them after that. |
5 |
Files, plural. If each RPM in the blob has separate licenses, we need to review |
6 |
all of them. |
7 |
|
8 |
Additionally, from the base license: |
9 |
] Subject to all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and any specific |
10 |
] restrictions which may appear in the Redistributables text files, Intel grants |
11 |
] to you a non-exclusive, non-assignable copyright license to distribute (except |
12 |
] under an Evaluation License as specified below) the Redistributables, or any |
13 |
] portions thereof, as part of the product or application you developed using the |
14 |
] Materials. |
15 |
|
16 |
Thus, we need to review the "any specific restrictions which may appear in the |
17 |
Redistributables text files" for problems as well. |
18 |
|
19 |
At a first reading, it smells badly. Do you know of any other distro that is |
20 |
redistribution the files as-is from upstream or other derivative |
21 |
distributable? |
22 |
|
23 |
P.S., |
24 |
As I feel it is appropriate here, IANAL, and this should not be construed as |
25 |
being legal advice. Rather, I feel sufficiently -versed in open source |
26 |
licensing issues that I can say if something is going to be clear or too grey |
27 |
to be certain. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
31 |
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead |
32 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
33 |
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |