On 07/12/2010 10:18 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> Rationale: Meeting summary for 20091012 is "to be completed". Meeting
> summary for 20100419 is also "to be completed", and all following
> council meetings lack summaries. This makes it hard to follow the
> council's work.

I've seen this at work quite a bit.  I've also seen an elegant solution 
that works moderately well.  The minutes of the meeting are taken in 
realtime during the meeting by whoever will take it, and this is shared 
with the participants in realtime.  This way errors in the minutes are 
instantly corrected.  When the meeting is done you just save and publish 
the minutes and you are done.

Realtime collaboration could involve any number of mechanisms.  I don't 
know if google docs supports it, but I imagine Wave would.  There might 
be other mechanisms as well.  Webex/GotoMeeting/etc are usually the 
methods employed in the business world.  There might be an FOSS equivalent.

I think this should be purely up to the council's discretion, but I 
wanted to offer this as a suggestion.

I'm not a fan of slacker marks in the first place - but, if you have to 
have them then I'd do it in a way so as to avoid creating a negative 
incentive for volunteering to do the work in the first place.

Rich