From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-libs/glibc: glibc-2.14.1-r2.ebuild glibc-2.12.2.ebuild glibc-9999.ebuild glibc-2.15.ebuild glibc-2.10.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.ebuild glibc-2.13-r2.ebuild ChangeLog glibc-2.13-r4.ebuild glibc-2.11.3.ebuild glibc-2.9_p20081201-r3.ebuild glibc-2.12.1-r3.ebuild glibc-2.14.1.ebuild | ||
Date: | Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:48:05 | ||
Message-Id: | 201201191146.17819.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-libs/glibc: glibc-2.14.1-r2.ebuild glibc-2.12.2.ebuild glibc-9999.ebuild glibc-2.15.ebuild glibc-2.10.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.ebuild glibc-2.13-r2.ebuild ChangeLog glibc-2.13-r4.ebuild glibc-2.11.3.ebuild glibc-2.9_p20081201-r3.ebuild glibc-2.12.1-r3.ebuild glibc-2.14.1.ebuild by "Michał Górny" |
1 | On Thursday 19 January 2012 04:32:46 Michał Górny wrote: |
2 | > On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:42:14 +0100 Michael Weber wrote: |
3 | > > Um, what happend to the policy to not f*** around with stable ebuilds? |
4 | > |
5 | > I don't think such a rule has any meaning considering that those |
6 | > ebuilds are mostly contained in an eclass. |
7 | |
8 | pedantically speaking, i think you're thinking of gcc. glibc is mostly |
9 | contained in eblits. practically speaking, it's mostly the same, although |
10 | there's a bit more control over things with eblits. |
11 | -mike |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |