Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-libs/glibc: glibc-2.14.1-r2.ebuild glibc-2.12.2.ebuild glibc-9999.ebuild glibc-2.15.ebuild glibc-2.10.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.ebuild glibc-2.13-r2.ebuild ChangeLog glibc-2.13-r4.ebuild glibc-2.11.3.ebuild glibc-2.9_p20081201-r3.ebuild glibc-2.12.1-r3.ebuild glibc-2.14.1.ebuild
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:48:05
Message-Id: 201201191146.17819.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-libs/glibc: glibc-2.14.1-r2.ebuild glibc-2.12.2.ebuild glibc-9999.ebuild glibc-2.15.ebuild glibc-2.10.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.ebuild glibc-2.13-r2.ebuild ChangeLog glibc-2.13-r4.ebuild glibc-2.11.3.ebuild glibc-2.9_p20081201-r3.ebuild glibc-2.12.1-r3.ebuild glibc-2.14.1.ebuild by "Michał Górny"
1 On Thursday 19 January 2012 04:32:46 Michał Górny wrote:
2 > On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:42:14 +0100 Michael Weber wrote:
3 > > Um, what happend to the policy to not f*** around with stable ebuilds?
4 >
5 > I don't think such a rule has any meaning considering that those
6 > ebuilds are mostly contained in an eclass.
7
8 pedantically speaking, i think you're thinking of gcc. glibc is mostly
9 contained in eblits. practically speaking, it's mostly the same, although
10 there's a bit more control over things with eblits.
11 -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature