1 |
On 11-10-2011 21:01:40 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
2 |
> On 10/11/2011 08:05 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
3 |
> > On 11-10-2011 19:59:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
4 |
> >> So I've missed one ${EPREFIX} for docdir= ? How about just fixing that, |
5 |
> >> and not crapping all over the package? |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > How about first asking the maintainer before you completely rewrite an |
8 |
> > ebuild? I'm not innocent on this topic either (ask Diego for example), |
9 |
> > and I do allow you to make a lot of changes to my packages. Just don't |
10 |
> > force your style and preferences on me. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> So basically you are saying you reverted tehnically correct changes for |
13 |
> cosmetics. What ticked you off, the \ lines changes? I believe that was |
14 |
> the only change that wasn't about fixing something broken. |
15 |
|
16 |
No, you broke the package for Prefix. Next you bumped it to EAPI=4, |
17 |
then you removed SRC_URI for no particular reason, dropped libtool files |
18 |
and dropped static archives. Next to this you did some reordering and |
19 |
other cosmetic changes. |
20 |
|
21 |
> And so have you, changed dozens of my ebuilds for PREFIX compability or |
22 |
> other random fixes, not everything turned out correct, mistakes were |
23 |
> made and were clearly accidental. I've fixed them instead of wasting |
24 |
> both of our times. Is it too much to ask for same in return? |
25 |
|
26 |
I already told you that you can change quite a lot to my ebuilds, |
27 |
without me complaining. Do you mind me reverting your stuff and redoing |
28 |
it now? |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Fabian Groffen |
33 |
Gentoo on a different level |