Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@g.o>
Subject: Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:21:33 +0100
On Friday 16 December 2011 06:10:13 Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Does your script do any checking on the quality of the ebuild, eg that
> it respects C/LDFLAGS.  If so, that's useful and would help package
> maintainers to better prepare their ebuilds for stabilization.
Unfortunately no. 

For LDFLAGS there is a QA warning and is enough visible
For CFLAGS I see with the naked eye a bit of build log
My script at "end of work" just runs repoman full and cat entire ebuild( so, 
imho, should be a tasks already done by maintainers).
Finally, I take a look at the ebuild to see if there are issue(s)

This is all.

> And congrats on making dev
Thanks ;)


Regards
Agostino
Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
Replies:
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
-- justin
References:
making the stable tree more up-to-date
-- PaweĊ‚ Hajdan, Jr.
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
-- Agostino Sarubbo
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
-- Anthony G. Basile
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
Next by thread:
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
Previous by date:
Last rites: kde-misc/kcheckgmail
Next by date:
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.