Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Christian Birchinger <joker@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: USE flags
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 17:16:51 +0200
Yes, a generic INSTALL_PROTECT sounds good. I'd vote for that :)
It should be used at the final merge stage and not before.

For performance reasons it could be also used at the untar stage
when using .tbz2 packages (with --exclude=FILE).

On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 01:08:13AM +0200, Spider wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:34:10 +0200
> bkhl@... (Björn Lindström) wrote:
> 
> 
> > And why couldn't those lines check the INSTALL_PROTECT (if that's what
> > we'll call it) variable? Including the non-installed files in binary
> > packages would work doesn't really have anything to do with whether
> > this is implemented as a FEATURE flag or a separate variable.
> > 
> 
> True, and then we could do some interesting default masking, like
> walling off /usr/local per default...
> 

--
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies:
Re: Re: USE flags
-- Luke-Jr
References:
USE flags
-- A. Craig West
Re: USE flags
-- Dhruba Bandopadhyay
Re: USE flags
-- david
Re: USE flags
-- Chris Gianelloni
Re: USE flags
-- Spider
Re: USE flags
-- Philippe Coulonges
Re: USE flags
-- Christian Birchinger
Re: USE flags
-- Spider
Re: USE flags
-- Björn Lindström
Re: Re: USE flags
-- Spider
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: USE flags
Next by thread:
Re: Re: USE flags
Previous by date:
Re: Documentation linkage or location
Next by date:
Re: livecd scripts


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.