Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
Subject: Re: udev and /usr
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 08:38:31 -0400
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Luca Barbato <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:lu_zero@g.o">lu_zero@g.o</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">I think putting more pressure so systemd isn&#39;t given as granted would be more healthy for both those who are not using it (because, again, is an aberration for any kind of daemon not written for it) and those that want to use it (since maybe as desktop-only it might have some nice integrations).</div>
</div>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I&#39;m not sure I&#39;ve seen anybody talk of it being a given (ie no other configuration is supported).  If many devs want openrc to stick around indefinitely I&#39;m sure it will remain supported.  </div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Probably just adding the dbus interfaces and thinning it down might be something useful if that integration might have use-cases.<br><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I would think the intent would be to stay close to upstream as is usually the case with Gentoo.  If they have integrations with 14 things than we should, and that shouldn&#39;t be horribly difficult since all the upstream projects would support them.  That said, there is wisdom in only tackling a few things at a time and having 2 working integrations might be more useful than 47 non-working ones.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Is there something in particular that is causing alarm with systemd?  All I&#39;ve seen is a package in the tree and some discussion.  I&#39;m sure there will be requests for various packages to install some files needed for integrations/etc.  If anything is traumatic I&#39;d be specific in stating concerns so that the root cause can be addressed.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Rich</div></div>
Replies:
Re: udev and /usr
-- Michał Górny
References:
udev and /usr
-- Joost Roeleveld
Re: udev and /usr
-- Luca Barbato
Re: udev and /usr
-- Joost Roeleveld
Re: udev and /usr
-- Luca Barbato
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: udev and /usr
Next by thread:
Re: udev and /usr
Previous by date:
Re: new `usex` helper
Next by date:
Re: udev and /usr


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.