Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Stroller <gentoogimp@×××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Cc: stroller@×××××××.com
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ISC-Bind inconsistancy
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 23:48:46
Message-Id: 1047685726.b6bb4300gentoogimp@myrealbox.com
1 "Thomas T. Veldhouse" wrote
2 >
3 > ... bind-tools ... bind itself
4 > I am a little unclear why there are two separate packages in
5 > the first place.
6
7 Whilst I can't comment on your other points, I supect that the short answer to this last is because "that's the way that Berkeley (?) package them'.
8
9 I can see good reason for having 2 separate packages: Joe User buys his DNS hosting service from ISP.net, as he lives out in the country & can't run a 24/7 Bind server (his servers are at another.isp.net & bigISP.com). He wants to query his DNS config periodically, however, to check it, and so he can make requests to customer.admin@×××.net; consequently Joe User needs Bind-tools, but not Bind itself.
10
11 HTH,
12
13 Stroller.
14
15
16
17 --
18 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] ISC-Bind inconsistancy "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@×××××.net>