| 1 |
That sounds great! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Sebastian Pipping <sping@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Quoting Ioannis Aslanidis <aslanidis@×××××.com>: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> I would prefer to keep the keyword for |
| 8 |
>> Bugday Members to administer. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I don't think that sending mails would work well. |
| 11 |
> If you want extra control/QA for bugday team members |
| 12 |
> I would propose two different keywords: one for bugday |
| 13 |
> candidates and one for confirmed bugday bugs. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Any dev could mark bugs as candidates easily and without |
| 16 |
> delays while you could still reserve acknoledgement to you. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Sebastian |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Ioannis Aslanidis |
| 31 |
http://www.deathwing00.org |
| 32 |
<deathwing00[at]gentoo.org> 0x47F370A0 |
Archives