| 1 |
Josh Saddler wrote: |
| 2 |
> Stefan Schweizer wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Josh Saddler wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 6 |
>>> Hash: SHA1 |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>> Stefan Schweizer wrote: |
| 9 |
>>> [. . .] |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> Define "contributors" -- is this a special status? If it is, how does |
| 12 |
>>> one *become* a "contributor" to get these rights? |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> This is potentially a big problem, the way I see it. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> As the word might tell a contributor is someone who is contributing. No |
| 17 |
>> special status involved. |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> - Stefan |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Contributing what? Contributing how much? Contributing how long? How is |
| 22 |
> quality measured? Is there a minimum level somewhere? X amount of ebuilds? |
| 23 |
> X amount of patches for docs/packages, or donating hardware, or adminning |
| 24 |
> a webnode somewhere? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
It does not matter. The real requirement is not to be defined as |
| 27 |
a "contributor" but to take the ebuild quiz: |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
"To ensure that not everyone who asks for it can get access to edit bugs it |
| 30 |
is required to complete the ebuild quiz prior to requesting access" |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-Stefan |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives