Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@...>
Subject: Re: RFD : .ebuild is only bash
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:04:24 +0000
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:00:32 +0100
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Zac Medico wrote:
> > If we do go with a variant of GLEP 55, I'd prefer a variant that
> > uses a constant extension (like .eb) and places the EAPI string
> > just after the version component of the name. For example:
> 
> >    foo-1.0-r1-eapi5.ebuild
> 
> This is so ugly... I guess I'll retire the same day when such an
> abomination gets accepted. ;-)
> 
> (Still better than the original variant of GLEP 55 though.)

I'm sorry, we're down to "it's ugly and someone already said no and I'll
throw my toys out of the pram if I don't get my way" as the arguments
against GLEP 55 now?

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: RFD : .ebuild is only bash
-- Ulrich Mueller
References:
RFD : .ebuild is only bash
-- Kent Fredric
Re: RFD : .ebuild is only bash
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: RFD : .ebuild is only bash
-- Rich Freeman
Re: RFD : .ebuild is only bash
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: RFD : .ebuild is only bash
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: RFD : .ebuild is only bash
-- Zac Medico
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: RFD : .ebuild is only bash
Next by thread:
Re: RFD : .ebuild is only bash
Previous by date:
Re: Lastrite: lilypond and reverse dependencies
Next by date:
Re: RFD : .ebuild is only bash


Updated Jun 23, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.