Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
Subject: Re: Do I really need the tree?
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 13:43:13 -0500
On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 02:53, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > Why does everyone always say "like games" anyway?  Games are
> > essential, man.  KDE and Gnome are cruft... ;p
> 
> Well for servers games are even less usefull than kde/gnome, allthough 
> both of them don't have a place on most servers either.

Except for servers servicing items from games-server... :]

Anyway, for now it is much simpler to have a tree of ebuilds which are
easily maintainable than a single (or a few) large xml files which would
become a maintenance nightmare for all the developers involved. 
Currently there are many developers who work on only one ebuild in a
particular area.  As a good example, I maintain exactly one ebuild in
app-emulation.  What kind of separation would there be for the xml
files?  How would different versions be accommodated?  Unless there was
some "magic" which translated the text ebuilds/eclasses/profiles into
xml (or a db, or whatever) before it went out to the world, and which
*didn't screw up* in the process, I don't think we'd see much of a
change any time soon.  Not to mention the amount of work that would need
to be done to portage itself to modify it to parse xml.  I know that
this sort of thing has been discussed before, and if memory serves me
correctly, the reason for not doing so was not so much it being a bad
idea or anything but really a matter of developer resources and
energies.  There's really nothing wrong with the current approach that
would be helped by having the portage tree be in xml or a database, at
least, not anything worth spending the tremendous amount of resources on
that it would take.  Personally, I would rather spend my time fixing
bugs and adding new features to portage, not redoing all of the work I
have done up until now to make it xml compliant.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Games Team

Is your power animal a pengiun?
Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)
Replies:
Re: Do I really need the tree?
-- Wazow
Re: Do I really need the tree?
-- Paul de Vrieze
References:
Do I really need the tree?
-- Manuzhai
Re: Do I really need the tree?
-- Paul de Vrieze
Re: Do I really need the tree?
-- Chris Gianelloni
Re: Do I really need the tree?
-- Paul de Vrieze
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Do I really need the tree?
Next by thread:
Re: Do I really need the tree?
Previous by date:
Re: separate debug information
Next by date:
Re: xchat's use of local USE flag xchatnogtk


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.