List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
El lun, 21-05-2012 a las 12:25 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> On 05/21/2012 12:04 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El lun, 21-05-2012 a las 13:46 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió:
> >> On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils, see
> >> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.133&r2=1.134
> >> Relying on autotools.eclass for your eutils needs was always a terrible
> >> idea, but a few ebuilds did it anyway. Those ebuilds are now *broken*
> >> since they can no longer use epatch. See bug #416847 for an example.
> >> Check your ebuilds to make sure you inherit eutils in anything that uses
> >> epatch!
> >> -Alexandre Rostovtsev.
> > Looks like ebuilds not inheriting eutils directly even using epatch are
> > a lot as I have seen running:
> > grep inherit $(grep -r epatch */*/*.ebuild| cut -d: -f1) | grep -v
> > eutils
> > Maybe they should be checked and a repoman warning should be added when
> > an ebuild is using epatch without inheriting eutils directly, otherwise
> > this problem could reappear if some other eclass no longer inherit it in
> > the future :-/
> Yeah, we have a similar check for inherit of prefix.eclass:
Should we (I) open a bug report requesting that or this is enough as
report? Thanks :)
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)