| 1 |
Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: |
| 3 |
>> 2008-08-02 04:02:48 Zac Medico napisaB(a): |
| 4 |
>> The names of other RESTRICT values are related to features which are |
| 5 |
>> restricted. The new proposed value is intended for live ebuilds so its |
| 6 |
>> name should be negation of this feature. I think that something like |
| 7 |
>> RESTRICT=constant-sources would be better. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Like I've said before, that particular convention is pretty |
| 10 |
> worthless in my eyes. I'd much prefer RESTRICT=live-sources if we |
| 11 |
> want to use a longer name. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Looks fine to me. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Luca Barbato |
| 18 |
Gentoo Council Member |
| 19 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
| 20 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
Archives