Archives
Archives
| From: | Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Maik Schreiber <blizzy@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev@g.o, gentoo-core <gentoo-core@g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" going in wrong direction ? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 16 Dec 2002 20:41:13 | ||
| Message-Id: | Pine.LNX.4.50.0212161537410.22911-100000@cerberus.localhost | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" going in wrong direction ? by Maik Schreiber |
||
| 1 | On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Maik Schreiber wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | [snip] |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > So again, there's no point in masking a package "unstable" just because its dependencies are "unstable". |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > -- |
| 8 | > Maik Schreiber, Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 9 | > http://www.gentoo.org |
| 10 | > mailto:blizzy@g.o |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > -- |
| 13 | > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 14 | > |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Er? If the dependencies are marked unstable and the package isn't, nobody |
| 18 | (or nobody only using stable keywords, I should say) can install it unless |
| 19 | the dependencies are marked stable... |
| 20 | |
| 21 | -- |
| 22 | Jon Portnoy |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | -- |
| 26 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" going in wrong direction ? | Matthew Walker <mwalker@×××××××.net> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" going in wrong direction ? | Maik Schreiber <blizzy@g.o> |