On Thu, 31 May 2012 14:18:04 -0500
William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote:
> > Not sure I'm following, but I will be the first to admit that I'm a
> > git novice.  Would this be aided by a convention, like only
> > committing to master on the gentoo official repository, and any
> > on-the-side work on places like github/etc stays in branches?
> > Those repositories would just keep getting fed commits on master
> > from the official repository.
> 
>  Iagree with this; I think we should ban merge commits on master. That
>  would force everyone to rebase their work on current master before
> they commit to master which would make the history clean.

So what's the point of switching to git if you want to ban the main
reason git exists?

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh