| 1 |
Honestly, giving the mplayer peoples preoccupation with the legality of |
| 2 |
what they are doing, if they are providing the downloading, I have no |
| 3 |
doubt it is completely legal. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I know OpenDivx (not sure if this is what divx4linux is based on or not) |
| 6 |
had a no binary-distribution license, but src was acceptable. Im hunting |
| 7 |
around on the mplayer site right now to try to find a definative answer. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
--Todd |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 19:50:49 +0200 |
| 14 |
> Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> wrote: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > Maybe they should be marked RESTRICT="nomirror" |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> But they would still be dependencies in that case. Maybe a "non-free" |
| 21 |
> USE flag could be useful for such situations. (Btw, is it possible to |
| 22 |
> have dependencies depending on several USE flags, like x86 & non-free |
| 23 |
> here?) |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> -- |
| 27 |
> Thomas de Grenier de Latour. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> -- |
| 30 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives