Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: George Prowse <george.prowse@...>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 18:48:30 +0100
On 09/04/2010 18:24, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 06:02:40PM +0100, George Prowse wrote:
>> On 09/04/2010 13:38, Ben de Groot wrote:
>>> On 9 April 2010 13:26, Guy Fontaine<guy.fontaine@...>   wrote:
>>>> There are things I know about Gentoo Linux and I'm pleased to share my knowledge with others as well as I'm glad to learn from others. I'm not a Gentoo dev and I neither have plan nor wish to be.
>>>>
>>>> My feeling is that Gentoo Wiki Project is just but another occasion for debating rules and politics. Reading some messages from some people I feel like I'm not welcome because I'm not a member of a group of selected people.
>>>
>>> Don't be dismayed by negative remarks, or a few naysayers who are not
>>> even part of the Gentoo Wiki Project. Any user (or dev) with
>>> constructive input is welcome. And as you volunteered, you are part of
>>> the project.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>
>> I still dont understand people's problems with this. Several devs have
>> said they've wanted one for years, it would be a great place to review
>> documentation before going in the official documentation, it's a great
>> place to discuss and collaborate on future dev handbook pages.
>>
>> The official wiki could and *should* work together with the unofficial
>> wiki because they complement eachother. The unofficial wiki isn't going
>> to want detailed OpenRC documentation and the official wiki isn't going
>> to want "how to set up FreeDOOM" on it.
>>
>
> Really? I understood it as the wiki being an all-purposes wiki, meaning users could (would and should) create articles on how to get some application running or how to get some setting working, and the developers will have their own "section", so to speak, where they can collaborate on various projects where a wiki would be an asset.
> It seems to me from the discussion here on the list that it is to centralize documentation (- the official docs), so that gentoo can point to the wiki and say "If it's not in our docs, maybe it's in the wiki".
>
> I may have mistaken the actual purpose of the wiki, but then by all means, correct me :-)
>
I see it as a collaboration piece, something to bridge the gap between 
developers and users. Users can create pages detailing certain facets of 
Gentoo and it may get to be included in the documentation on gentoo.org.

Some documentation is unfit for an official wiki but that doesn't mean 
that the information doesn't need to be there for users, that is where 
the official and unofficial wiki should work together .


References:
[RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project
-- Ben de Groot
Re: Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project
-- Ben de Groot
Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project
-- Ryan Hill
RE: Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project
-- Sylvain Alain
Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project
-- Ryan Hill
RE: Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project
-- Sylvain Alain
Re: Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project
-- Guy Fontaine
Re: Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project
-- Ben de Groot
Re: Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project
-- George Prowse
Re: Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project
-- Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project
Next by thread:
Re: Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project
Previous by date:
Re: Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project
Next by date:
Re: Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.