1 |
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:28 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
2 |
> As such, I disagree with floppym that the handbook's kernel module |
3 |
> section needs updating for this, too. The handbook doesn't even deal |
4 |
> with non-default dev-managers, nor does it mention module-init-tools, it |
5 |
> just assumes it's there. Udev, as the default dev-manager, will be |
6 |
> pulling in kmod already, with its default module-init-tools compatibility |
7 |
> meaning no change in documentation necessary. Only if we're going to |
8 |
> start giving users dev-manager alternatives in the handbook does it |
9 |
> become an issue, and while that would be nice, I don't think it's |
10 |
> necessary for this change. |
11 |
|
12 |
Yes, I did not think that through. If kmod gets pulled in via udev in |
13 |
the stage3 tarballs, the docs are fine as-is. |