1 |
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:50:22 +1200 |
2 |
Alistair Bush <ali_bush@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> I would believe that recent history would show the opposite. There |
5 |
> seem to be a group of developers at which the mere mention of ciaranm |
6 |
> results in setting them off. Regardless of the technical merits of a |
7 |
> solution they seem more interested in just derailing anything that |
8 |
> might have anything to do with ciaramn. |
9 |
|
10 |
Correct. When he was booted off the project the last time, I breathed |
11 |
again and picked up my waning interest in Gentoo and it has thrived |
12 |
since. |
13 |
|
14 |
> I realise that ciaranm has had a nasty past. But recently I haven't |
15 |
> see anything. I for one hope that this continues and that other |
16 |
> members of the community take a look at themselves before spouting |
17 |
> about the evils of ciaramn. |
18 |
|
19 |
I have come to know Ciaran as an elitist little twerp and he is |
20 |
one of a few people in the world I wouldn't want to meet, or wouldn't |
21 |
know what I'd do to if I did meet him. It's really that bad, yes. The |
22 |
man brought it all on himself for the nasty things he did in the past |
23 |
and should publicly apologise for each and every time he offended |
24 |
someone in a web-e-vised 20 hour sorry-a-thon before[1] he is allowed |
25 |
back to do more than voice his opinion on Gentoo-held media. |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
Thank you kindly, |
29 |
jer |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
[1] Which isn't going to happen. |