| 1 |
2010-03-22 22:12:54 Jacob Godserv napisał(a): |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:11, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
| 3 |
> <Arfrever@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > 2010-03-20 01:51:44 Duncan napisał(a): |
| 5 |
> >> So let's just recognize that it's not a perfect situation, create a news |
| 6 |
> >> item saying that python-3 will soon (give a date) be unmasked, and suggest |
| 7 |
> >> that users not needing it may wish to package.mask it themselves, with a |
| 8 |
> >> link to documentation with specific instructions and a bit more detail on |
| 9 |
> >> why they might wish to mask it and under what circumstances they might not. |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> >> I'd suggest an unmasking date 30 days after the release of the news item. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Python 3 is not masked. The discussion is about stabilization. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Duncan's comments still apply, though, right? What's against writing a |
| 16 |
> news item about stabilizing Python? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
There is already a thread about news item: |
| 19 |
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_814e67764c17f88bde94f22e9a392e4f.xml |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Archives