Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] fix binary debug support, part elevenity billion + 1
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 13:51:49
Message-Id: 448828FA.9010808@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] fix binary debug support, part elevenity billion + 1 by Ned Ludd
1 Ned Ludd wrote:
2 > On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 06:49 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
3 >
4 >>Mike Frysinger wrote:
5 >>
6 >>>On Wednesday 07 June 2006 19:12, Alec Warner wrote:
7 >>>
8 >>>
9 >>>>I would be more concerned with convincing the rest of the developers.
10 >>>>adding crap in base profile.bashrc will affect 99% of users, so it
11 >>>>better be friggin correct and useful, otherwise you will piss a ton of
12 >>>>people off.
13 >>>
14 >>>
15 >>>versus the people who are really annoyed that such support hasnt yet been
16 >>>integrated into portage proper ?
17 >>>
18 >>>yes, from the portage side of things, it may be a pita to implement
19 >>>per-package env ... but from the user side of things, it's a huge help
20 >>>-mike
21 >>
22 >>My e-mail was basically worded as to say "Solar paste your crap to this
23 >>ML."
24 >
25 >
26 > Alright...
27 >
28 > tail -n 6 /usr/portage/profiles/uclibc/profile.bashrc
29 >
30 > #for conf in ${PN}-${PV}-${PR} ${PN}-${PV} ${PN}; do
31 > # if [[ -r /etc/portage/env/$CATEGORY/${conf} ]]; then
32 > # . /etc/portage/env/$CATEGORY/${conf}
33 > # break
34 > # fi
35 > #done
36
37 Ideas on multipile sources?
38
39 Aka, I want all these env things enable for kde-base/* but for
40 kde-base/foo I want extra stuff ( or to negate things ), it looks like
41 this only sources things once?
42
43 Could we define a stacking order here and let them stack?
44
45 >
46 >
47 >> Is there any reason you need package.env in portage proper as
48 >>opposed to bashrc?
49 >
50 >
51 > Nope.. bashrc is the only way to access the variables in a way that
52 > is the most friendly to the bash side of things.
53 >
54
55 --
56 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies