Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing expat 2.0.0
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:26:05
Message-Id: pan.2007.05.15.17.22.21@cox.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing expat 2.0.0 by Caleb Tennis
1 "Caleb Tennis" <caleb@g.o> posted
2 38928.192.168.2.155.1179228617.squirrel@××××××××××××.com, excerpted below,
3 on Tue, 15 May 2007 07:30:17 -0400:
4
5 > I'd like to open a bug soon requesting the stabiliztion of
6 > dev-libs/expat-2.0.0*. It's currently assigned to tcltk, but the bug
7 > traffic seems to indicate they don't know why they have it. If nobody
8 > steps up, objects, and is willing to take over maintenance I will do so.
9 >
10 > * - This version has a new soname, so it will require a revdep-rebuild,
11 > which is probably why it hasn't been stabilized as of now.
12
13 I don't see it mentioned in the bug (128069 anyway) or in the discussion
14 so far, and while it might be considered obvious, just in case...
15
16 Wasn't the ~ intro of this what precipitated the whole GLEP 42 (news)
17 thing? I know news came up again recently and due to the lack of a news
18 reading client for portage, further use was put on hold. Has that been
19 resolved? Because if there's a place where a preemptive news function is
20 needed, this is it! Thus, if at all possible, having news working and
21 using it for this should be SERIOUSLY considered.
22
23 Regardless of whether news is ready or not, however, please make sure
24 it's covered in GWN at LEAST the week prior, and preferably for a couple
25 weeks in a row. (Yes, an upgrade /can/ be that bad.) Also, please make
26 sure it's announced on the forums and on the user list. For those that
27 don't see it after that, well... at least there'll be plenty of places to
28 refer the bug filers to.
29
30 Alternatively, this is the /one/ case I've come across where I might
31 actually be in favor of putting an IM_SURE_IM_READY_TO_UPGRADE_EXPAT=1
32 test in the ebuild, dying if not. (No, I didn't /think/ that'd go
33 anywhere, but seriously, if there's a case where it might be warranted,
34 this is it. Not saying that it is.)
35
36 It's probably a bit late now (unless we want to wait yet another few
37 months), but tying this to a profile upgrade might have been a more
38 practical solution. 2007.0, or now 2007.1. Old profiles would stick
39 with the old expat, and new ones would get the new one. People are
40 generally prepared for at least a /bit/ of extra upheaval when they do
41 profile upgrades, and that would have made the PR a bit easier as well,
42 since that's a natural time for it.
43
44 --
45 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
46 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
47 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
48
49 --
50 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing expat 2.0.0 "Rémi Cardona" <remi@g.o>