| 1 |
On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 01:36:15 Graham Murray wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> writes: |
| 3 |
> > well, not quite. the way we agreed in the past was to not revbump the |
| 4 |
> > masked package, but once it was unmasked, we revbump it just once at |
| 5 |
> > that point. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Is there somewhere which tells users when there are upgrades to |
| 8 |
> toolchain packages which are not revbumped once they have been unmasked |
| 9 |
> and in ~arch? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
if they arent revbumped, then the changes dont matter to you |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> A case in point, glibc-2.12.1-r3. When I rebuilt this following the |
| 14 |
> merging of linux-headers-2.6.36, the rebuilt downloaded about 700K of |
| 15 |
> patches. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
irrelevant to your KEYWORD |
| 18 |
-mike |
Archives