Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Lastrite: media-gfx/pngcrush
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 02:50:52
Message-Id: 20111010205928.34341ad2@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: media-gfx/pngcrush by Markos Chandras
1 On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 02:41:15 +0100
2 Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
5 > Hash: SHA512
6 >
7 > On 10/08/11 22:45, Matt Turner wrote:
8 > > On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Markos Chandras
9 > > <hwoarang@g.o> wrote:
10 > >> On 10/08/2011 02:19 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
11 > >>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Samuli Suominen
12 > >>> <ssuominen@g.o> wrote:
13 > >>>> # Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> (08 Oct 2011) #
14 > >>>> Fails to compile against system libpng15, bug 356127 #
15 > >>>> Removal in 14 days
16 > >>>
17 > >>> 14 days?
18 > >>>
19 > >>>> media-gfx/pngcrush
20 > >>>
21 > >> We can't really wait forever for slacking maintainers to fix
22 > >> their packages. amd64 is almost ready to have libpng-1.5 stable
23 > >> in the very near future
24 > >
25 > > Two things:
26 > >
27 > > 1) I'm *really* tired of the usage of the word "slacking" on this
28 > > mailing list. If you or someone else wants to pay me to work on
29 > > Gentoo, *then* you can tell me that I'm slacking. Otherwise, I'm a
30 > > volunteer working on things that interest me in my free time. I
31 > > truly do have more important things to do than to figure out how to
32 > > port pngcrush to libpng1.5. Namely, graduate school and midterm
33 > > exams.
34 >
35 > The bug is open since February (9 months). If you can't handle a bug
36 > in 9 months then maybe you should consider stepping down as a
37 > maintainer. Handling does not necessarily mean fixing. Masking could
38 > be an acceptable solution as well. The fact that nobody pays us does
39 > not mean that we can use that as an excuse for lower the QA barrier of
40 > portage tree. If only I got a $1 everytime I hear this "excuse"...
41
42 Um, you really want me to mask my package 9 months in advance because it
43 blocks some random tracker that I have no idea when will become relevant?
44
45 How about no.
46
47 The onus of masking the package is on the person that institutes the
48 deadline. Stop being surprised that people don't think your personal pet
49 project is as important as you do.
50
51
52 --
53 fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense
54 toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it free anytime
55 @ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature