1 |
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 02:41:15 +0100 |
2 |
Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
5 |
> Hash: SHA512 |
6 |
> |
7 |
> On 10/08/11 22:45, Matt Turner wrote: |
8 |
> > On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Markos Chandras |
9 |
> > <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
10 |
> >> On 10/08/2011 02:19 PM, Matt Turner wrote: |
11 |
> >>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Samuli Suominen |
12 |
> >>> <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
13 |
> >>>> # Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> (08 Oct 2011) # |
14 |
> >>>> Fails to compile against system libpng15, bug 356127 # |
15 |
> >>>> Removal in 14 days |
16 |
> >>> |
17 |
> >>> 14 days? |
18 |
> >>> |
19 |
> >>>> media-gfx/pngcrush |
20 |
> >>> |
21 |
> >> We can't really wait forever for slacking maintainers to fix |
22 |
> >> their packages. amd64 is almost ready to have libpng-1.5 stable |
23 |
> >> in the very near future |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > Two things: |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > 1) I'm *really* tired of the usage of the word "slacking" on this |
28 |
> > mailing list. If you or someone else wants to pay me to work on |
29 |
> > Gentoo, *then* you can tell me that I'm slacking. Otherwise, I'm a |
30 |
> > volunteer working on things that interest me in my free time. I |
31 |
> > truly do have more important things to do than to figure out how to |
32 |
> > port pngcrush to libpng1.5. Namely, graduate school and midterm |
33 |
> > exams. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> The bug is open since February (9 months). If you can't handle a bug |
36 |
> in 9 months then maybe you should consider stepping down as a |
37 |
> maintainer. Handling does not necessarily mean fixing. Masking could |
38 |
> be an acceptable solution as well. The fact that nobody pays us does |
39 |
> not mean that we can use that as an excuse for lower the QA barrier of |
40 |
> portage tree. If only I got a $1 everytime I hear this "excuse"... |
41 |
|
42 |
Um, you really want me to mask my package 9 months in advance because it |
43 |
blocks some random tracker that I have no idea when will become relevant? |
44 |
|
45 |
How about no. |
46 |
|
47 |
The onus of masking the package is on the person that institutes the |
48 |
deadline. Stop being surprised that people don't think your personal pet |
49 |
project is as important as you do. |
50 |
|
51 |
|
52 |
-- |
53 |
fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense |
54 |
toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it free anytime |
55 |
@ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |