Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Peter Volkov <pva@g.o>
Subject: Re: SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:58:37 +0400
В Вск, 26/06/2011 в 17:20 +0200, Maciej Mrozowski пишет:
> I never understood the reason after keeping deps not sorted alphabetically 
> where order doesn't matter - it's like someone purposely made ebuild harder to 
> read - it's counter productive.

Like with perl modules with well written configure.ac I like them to be
sorted in the order there. This way makes easier for me to see if there
is anything redundant in deps or not.

--
Peter.



References:
SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml
-- justin
Re: SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml
-- Nirbheek Chauhan
Re: SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml
-- Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Re: SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml
-- Maciej Mrozowski
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml
Next by thread:
Thoughts about broken package handling
Previous by date:
Re: Are tags just sets?
Next by date:
Re: SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.