| 1 |
Le samedi 26 juillet 2008 à 21:39 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar |
| 2 |
Arahesis a écrit : |
| 3 |
> 2008-07-26 21:35:08 Donnie Berkholz napisał(a): |
| 4 |
> > On 18:37 Sat 26 Jul , Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > Mark Loeser (Halcy0n) (QA project leader) said on 2008-07-24 that this policy |
| 6 |
> > > doesn't exist. I understand that bug reports about LDFLAGS being ignored are |
| 7 |
> > > usually fixed, so I ask for the formal enacting of this policy. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Why are you asking us? He's the QA lead, you should be talking with the |
| 10 |
> > QA team about this. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Halcy0n said that this policy required prior discussion on this mailing list. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
like Ciaran said, fixing packages ignoring LDFLAGS isn't going to be top |
| 16 |
priority because it is far less important than fixing packages ignoring |
| 17 |
CFLAGS or doing pre-stripping. If making this a policy can make you |
| 18 |
happy, I see no problem with that. It won't make bugs fix themselves |
| 19 |
either way. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
| 23 |
Gentoo |
Archives