List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Friday 16 December 2011 11:42:15 justin wrote:
> I really like that you open all those bugs. But it makes no sense to add
> arches after a "time out".
Personally, I agree with have "more stable packages in tree", but I just point
out one thing. If me, or another arch tester find ebuild issue(s) and
maintainers does not care of it, makes no sense imho.
I mark stable with a script and I'm uncomfortable to fix them. As Justin said,
all maintainers are responsible of their packages, so I'd prefer to not touch
If you(for any developers) are busy and/or you can't fix them, feel free to
mail me or just give an "ack" via irc and I'll provide to fix.
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)