| 1 |
On Friday 16 December 2011 11:42:15 justin wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I really like that you open all those bugs. But it makes no sense to add |
| 5 |
> arches after a "time out". |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Personally, I agree with have "more stable packages in tree", but I just point |
| 8 |
out one thing. If me, or another arch tester find ebuild issue(s) and |
| 9 |
maintainers does not care of it, makes no sense imho. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I mark stable with a script and I'm uncomfortable to fix them. As Justin said, |
| 12 |
all maintainers are responsible of their packages, so I'd prefer to not touch |
| 13 |
other stuff. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
If you(for any developers) are busy and/or you can't fix them, feel free to |
| 16 |
mail me or just give an "ack" via irc and I'll provide to fix. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Regards |
| 19 |
Agostino |
Archives