Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@g.o>
Subject: Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:06:23 +0100
On Friday 16 December 2011 11:42:15 justin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I really like that you open all those bugs. But it makes no sense to add
> arches after a "time out". 

Personally, I agree with have "more stable packages in tree", but I just point 
out one thing. If me, or another arch tester find ebuild issue(s) and 
maintainers does not care of it, makes no sense imho. 

I mark stable with a script and I'm uncomfortable to fix them. As Justin said, 
all maintainers are responsible of their packages, so I'd prefer to not touch 
other stuff.

If you(for any developers) are busy and/or you can't fix them, feel free to 
mail me or just give an "ack" via irc and I'll provide to fix.

Regards
Agostino
Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
Replies:
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
-- Anthony G. Basile
References:
making the stable tree more up-to-date
-- PaweĊ‚ Hajdan, Jr.
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
-- justin
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
Next by thread:
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
Previous by date:
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
Next by date:
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.