Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder on dependencies.
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:30:18
Message-Id: 435DFAB1.90603@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder on dependencies. by Grant Goodyear
1 Grant Goodyear wrote:
2 > At the same time, I'm suppose that including header files by default is
3 > not such a good thing for the embedded folks.
4
5 Exactly. And hacking around that with some USE flags for embedded just
6 says, to me, that we can't make a decision: we'll enforce this "usable
7 for compiling" thing most of the time, but not for them. So it's a rule
8 of convenience.
9
10 I'm still failing to see how headers have anything to do with runtime
11 issues -- it should be people's responsibility to ensure they have the
12 necessary headers if they're compiling things that require them. And
13 compiling means DEPEND.
14
15 Maybe for some people compiling is included in runtime, but I'm not one
16 of them.
17
18 Thanks,
19 Donnie
20 --
21 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder on dependencies. Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder on dependencies. Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>