1 |
On 05/01/2011 11:39 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote: |
2 |
> On 04/30/2011 10:40 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote: |
3 |
>> On 04/28/2011 04:07 PM, Christian Ruppert wrote: |
4 |
>>> So once again: |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/docs/en/html/lifecycle.html |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> *Every* new bug filed by a user without editbugs will have "UNCONFIRMED" |
9 |
>>> (old NEW) as fixed status. |
10 |
>>> *If* we don't enable the UNCONFIRMED status at all then it will |
11 |
>>> CONFIRMED as default but we would enable the UNCONFIRMED status. |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> Bug wranglers can then assign the bug and they also *can* mark it as |
14 |
>>> CONFIRMED *if* they *can* confirm it. |
15 |
>>> The maintainer may change the status to IN_PROGRESS (old ASSIGNED) |
16 |
>>> afterwards. |
17 |
>>> |
18 |
>>> The snipped of my first mail may be a bit confusing... It just means: |
19 |
>>> NEW will become CONFIRMED, NEW has been fully replaced by CONFIRMED so |
20 |
>>> NEW is gone but CONFIRMED is *not* the new default status. CONFIRMED |
21 |
>>> would/could be the default for everybody with editbugs. |
22 |
>>> ASSIGNED gone, replacement: IN_PROGRESS, |
23 |
>>> REOPENED gone, |
24 |
>>> CLOSED gone. VERIFIED will be added. |
25 |
>>> |
26 |
>>> So I think we should convert... |
27 |
>>> |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>> I think I'll convert the workflow in about 24h if nobody really |
30 |
>> complains. There is more positive feedback anyway. |
31 |
>> |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Done. The new workflow is online. |
34 |
> |
35 |
|
36 |
Before I forgot.. You may have to update your saved searches in |
37 |
Bugzilla. In the most cases its just that "UNCONFIRMED" has not been |
38 |
selected. |
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
Regards, |
42 |
Christian Ruppert |
43 |
Role: Gentoo Linux developer, Bugzilla administrator and Infrastructure |
44 |
member |
45 |
Fingerprint: EEB1 C341 7C84 B274 6C59 F243 5EAB 0C62 B427 ABC8 |