Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Max Kalika <max+lists.gentoo-dev@×××××××××.edu>
To: Daniel Armyr <daniel.armyr@××××.se>, gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: new local USE var: vim-with-x
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 14:50:05
Message-Id: 1250000.1051627788@[192.168.23.6]
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: new local USE var: vim-with-x by Daniel Armyr
1 Quoting Daniel Armyr <daniel.armyr@××××.se>:
2
3 >| This is yet another reason why portage needs to have support for USE
4 >| flags to be applied on a per-package basis.
5 >
6 > Hm, I love the way the USE flags are working, but I definatey think it
7 > is time to look over the system. I think we have scaled it up as far as
8 > it goes soon, and Gentoo isn't exactly shrinking.
9
10 Well, fortunately this doesn't change the way "stock" USE flags are
11 handled. The per-package stuff is optional for finer-grained control of
12 your installed apps.
13
14 ---max kalika
15 --max@×××××××××.edu
16 -lsit systems administrator
17
18 --
19 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: new local USE var: vim-with-x Caleb Shay <caleb@××××××××.com>