Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Bugzilla interaction guide for devs & editbugs users
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:30:51
Message-Id: robbat2-20100907T212225-495258166Z@orbis-terrarum.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Bugzilla interaction guide for devs & editbugs users by "Róbert Čerňanský"
1 On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:47:27PM +0200, Róbert Čerňanský wrote:
2 > 2.3. Upstream issues
3 > Do not close a bug (as RESOLVED/UPSTREAM) until it is fixed by
4 > upstream.
5 This implies that the upstream is alive enough to fix it.
6
7 I feel it should mean that the bug has been reported to upstream, and
8 that state is documented in the bug.
9
10 If we keep every upstream bug open instead of closed, we'd have probably
11 another 2500 open bugs (5312 RESO/UPSTREAM in the history of Gentoo, and
12 I'm ballparking that 50% aren't actually fixed yet upstream).
13
14 --
15 Robin Hugh Johnson
16 Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead
17 E-Mail : robbat2@g.o
18 GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

Replies