| 1 |
Le vendredi 15 juin 2012 à 21:04 +0200, Pacho Ramos a écrit : |
| 2 |
> El vie, 15-06-2012 a las 09:03 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
| 3 |
> > El mar, 12-06-2012 a las 23:02 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió: |
| 4 |
> > > i've noticed a growing trend where people put setup of variables into |
| 5 |
> > > pkg_setup that only matter to src_* funcs presumably so they don't have to |
| 6 |
> > > call the respective src_* func from an inherited eclass. unfortunately this |
| 7 |
> > > adds pointless overhead to binpkgs. can we please move away from this |
| 8 |
> > > practice ? |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > i've seen this with a good number of the GNOME packages like: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
[...] |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
This is most likely historic and reading the eclasses, I see no use of |
| 15 |
G2CONF that would forbid working from src_configure. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I guess the pratice emerged from not wanting to write |
| 18 |
gnome2_src_configure all the time but if there is a reason (like the one |
| 19 |
you exposed) to do it this way, then it'll become our new standard |
| 20 |
pratice :) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
| 24 |
Gentoo |
Archives