Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Francesco Riosa <vivo75@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecate EAPI1?
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:15:50
Message-Id: CAD6zcDzwBr2bDp2Nf1CLgpSA30um=SbKoacsrF3raLPcFLTmEA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecate EAPI1? by Richard Yao
1 top-posting me too to avoid more confusion, sorry
2
3 Se my other reply to this thread, upgrading in place an old gentoo
4 install is nearly impossible, it's so bad that glibc breakage can
5 occour, that require a knowledge of the system so high that everything
6 else become nuances of a vague problem.
7 Tell everyone that it's not possible to upgrade a 2009 system id more
8 honest and free everybody from forever compatibility slavery.
9
10 To be able to upgrade a gentoo installation as old as five years is
11 interesting and valuable but require an effort that has yet to be
12 made.
13
14 P.S. I'm neutral about EAPI 1 deprecation, just stating that forever
15 support is a chimera right now
16
17 2012/3/11 Richard Yao <ryao@×××××××××××××.edu>:
18 > These must be maintained indefinitely to provide an upgrade path for
19 > older Gentoo Linux installations. It is rare, but people do upgrade
20 > old installs from time to time. Without some EAPI=1 packages, there is
21 > no path for people to use to upgrade.
22 >
23 > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote:
24 >> After reading previous discussion:
25 >> http://help.lockergnome.com/linux/gentoo-dev-Deprecate-EAPIs--ftopict530567.html
26 >>
27 >> Looks like preventing NEW commits from using eapi1 (via repoman) could
28 >> be done without major issues. This could even being done also for eapi2
29 >> as it's close enough to eapi3, but I don't have a strong opinion about
30 >> eapi2 deprecation (personally, I try to always use latest eapi if eclass
31 >> allows me to do so).
32 >>
33 >> Any thoughts on this?
34 >>
35 >> Thanks
36 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecate EAPI1? Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>