Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:05:18
Message-Id: 4E2DE86B.4090508@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated by Nirbheek Chauhan
1 On 07/25/2011 12:59 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
2 > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote:
3 >> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200
4 >> Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@g.o> wrote:
5 >>
6 >>> So go claim your commits,
7 >>
8 >> Great work!
9 >>
10 >>> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo
11 >>> [2]
12 >>> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary
13 >>
14 >> It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest
15 >> commits look to be the likely cause.
16 >>
17 >
18 > Another reason for all of us to move to gpg signed manifests — another
19 > commit free with every ebuild commit!
20
21 Well, even without the signing step, the Manifest has to be committed
22 separately because the cvs $Header thing causes the ebuild digest to
23 change as soon as it is committed.
24 --
25 Thanks,
26 Zac

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>