| 1 |
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 19:34 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:31:23 +0100 |
| 3 |
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Wouldn't be any shorter way to build all CAMERAS? We don't want to |
| 5 |
> > default to enabling all, with the new way of handling this, if CAMERAS |
| 6 |
> > is not set or is empty, nothing will be built but, if CAMERAS="*" |
| 7 |
> > shouldn't be used, what should we use instead of having to manually |
| 8 |
> > add all of them to make.conf (from a user point of view) |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Why not specify all the CAMERAS you know about as being on by default in |
| 11 |
> the profile? Users who care enough can override this with an explicit |
| 12 |
> subset. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
If rest of gnome team agrees, I think we could go with, but I still fail |
| 16 |
to see what is the "technical" problem on allowing CAMERAS="*" to be |
| 17 |
used :-| |
Archives